Archive: for previous months, see here.

June

Speedy deletion nomination of Bartholomew Silver

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bartholomew Silver requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Reichsfürst (talk) 19:02, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SPI Case Notice

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence here. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 13:04, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bartholomew Silver

The article Bartholomew Silver has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not assert notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ΔT _{^{The only constant}} 02:09, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fluttershy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fluttershy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluttershy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Flutter shy !xmcuvg2MH 02:32, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pinkie Pie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pinkie Pie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinkie Pie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Blackgaia02 (Talk if you're Worthy) (talk) 01:11, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dirty Pair

Category:Dirty Pair, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:54, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Polyglycerol listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Polyglycerol. Since you had some involvement with the Polyglycerol redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. I like to saw logs! (talk) 05:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harris Stone

Hello, Dictabeard. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Harris Stone, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Harris Stone to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Shootingstar111 (talk) 06:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]